Butt out: Town considers smoking ban, fine increase (July 18, 2008)

By Nate Jones
Staff Writer
The cost of noncompliance with the town of Cape Elizabeth’s miscellaneous offenses ordinance – which includes restrictions on nude and topless bathing, penalties for defacing public property, animal control stipulations and Fort Williams Park regulations – could more than double should the town council accept a set of proposed amendments to the ordinance.
“It hasn’t been changed in 30 years,” Town Manager Michael McGovern said.
On Monday, the town council voted to send the proposed changes to the ordinance committee for review.
The proposal increases fines for all prohibited activities listed within the ordinance such as disturbing the peace, camping on public property with out a permit and violating Fort Williams Park regulations – all $100 fines – and fines for loitering in a public place – a $50 fine – to $250.
In addition to the increase, the proposal adds a permit provision to Fort Williams Park regulations concerning commercial filming and wedding parties including more than 20 people. Town Council Chairman Mary Ann Lynch is also recommending a smoking ban on park grounds.
Cape Elizabeth Public Works Director Robert Malley said currently, commercial photographers are required to gain permission from the town prior to filming, and out-of-state photographers must pay a $2,500 fee; in-state photography companies pay anywhere from $1,000 to $1,500. When contacted, Malley said the town is usually accommodating to the request.
“We were recently contacted by a media consultant for Chrysler who wanted to do some filming in the park,” he said. “We basically walked them through it beforehand, showed them where they could do it. We try to weed through what they’re attempting to do.”
Malley said large corporations aren’t the only ones looking to roll their cameras at the park; recently a couple requested permission to film in the park for an upcoming Internet documentary.
“For what they were looking to do, it didn’t warrant the $2,500,” he said.
Malley said smaller operations, such as the documentary couple, are often charged a few hundred dollars. All monies received from commercial filming, large or small, are put into a Fort Williams capital fund to help pay for improvements to the park, he said.
The town receives about half a dozen commercial filming requests a year, and nearly 30 requests for weddings at Fort Williams, which could only be a fraction of the marriages actually occurring on park grounds, Malley said.
“Some of these things happen and we don’t know about them,” he said. “Sometimes they just show up and start, and we don’t want to bust in on the middle of a ceremony. We’re in a bad bargaining position.”
The proposed $250 fine for hosting a commercial photo shoot or wedding without first acquiring a permit from the town could help give public works employees “a little teeth” when approaching those in violation of the ordinance, Malley said.
“It gives us some mechanism to say ‘There’s a penalty,” he said. “That way we at least get the fine rather than nothing at all.”
Town Council Chairman Mary Ann Lynch is endorsing an amendment to the Fort Williams Park section of the ordinance that would ban smoking on park grounds, more for environmental reasons than health issues created by smokers, she said.
“I don’t want to be telling people what to do with their own health,” she said. “But I am struck by the number of cigarette butts [around the park].”
Malley said there are no trash receptacles or cigarette collectors in Fort Williams Park since park goers are expected to comply with the “carry-in, carry-out” policy.
“People seem to think butts are not garbage,” Lynch said.
Both Malley and Lynch said they were aware enforcing a no-smoking policy for Fort Williams would be difficult with only one park ranger – for all of the 96 acres – in the town, but were hopeful residents would help ensure compliance.
“Most people want to obey the laws,” Lynch said. “We don’t say that it’s hard to catch every speeder, so let’s not have speeding laws. It’s something we need to consider but not let it move forward.”
McGovern said he did not expect the increase in fines or the amendments would a significant effect on the Fort Williams capital fund or the town budget. Often the threat of a fine is enough to keep people within the law, he said.
“We’re just making sure we retain everyone else’s right to the park,” he said.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 7/17/2008 5:19 PM Rob Moffatt wrote:
    Corrupt Fascist Politicians should be arrested and thrown in jail. These corrupted individuals stop representing and respecting those who bother to show up to vote the very minute the polls close. special interest groups and lobbyists then take priority. Our tax revenue is then funneled to these non elected groups for advertising campaigns in segregation and hate. The various media have been failing society at taking the political trash to the curb and we have noticed as you do in greatly reduced profit margins. The evil that was the Second World War didn't die at the war's end, it hid and is now being openly funded and promoted by our governments via the proven corrupt United Nations. Have we learned nothing from the likes of Mussolini and Hitler?? Remember Nuremberg, least we forget....
    Reply to this
  • 7/17/2008 8:30 PM brogers wrote:
    Get rid of smoking bans and the butts will disappear from the parks. Simple as that.
    Reply to this
  • 7/18/2008 12:58 AM Thomas Laprade wrote:
    No smoking in the park is ludicrous.
    If the higher ups are concerned about litter, then they should enfore their 'litter' law.
    Does that make sense??

    http://smokersclubinc.com
    Reply to this
  • 7/18/2008 1:36 PM Jacob Leddy wrote:
    This is just ridiculous. With Crown7 theres no need to worry about any of these bans or being fined. I can smoke anywhere now thanks to Crown7. Has anyone tried one yet???
    Reply to this
  • 10/31/2008 10:09 AM New car invoice prices wrote:
    "the proposal adds a permit provision to Fort Williams Park regulations concerning commercial filming". It is fine to charge large Companies such us Chrysler for commercial filming, but for independent educational filming there should be no charge at all!
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.